The Lost Symbol
7 Oct
Dan Brown returns to ignite a thinking audience with his latest book, “The Lost Symbol.”
“The Lost Symbol” is generally about Robert Langdon’s efforts to save his friend and mentor, Peter Solomon. It began with an unexpected, immediate but privileged invitation to sub/replace a speaker who was supposed to present at a private thanksgiving gala for the generous supporters of the Smithsonian Institute.
It was too late for Langdon to realize that he was pawned into a trap, in a way, blackmailed to play his part in a dangerous web of secrecy and ploys, meant to trigger an irreparable chaos of utmost magnitude. At most part of the book, and not only for Langdon, each has a role to play and it’s the fool who got played. But then, like an old Filipino saying goes, “Matalino man ang matsing, napaglalamangan din” (“An intelligent monkey can still be beaten.”); the pupeteer, Mal’akh did not get what he wanted, not the knowledge, not the secret, not the apotheois he dreamed or the death he foresaw.
Using what I refer to as the Dan Brown Formula, he once again, used minimal characters (usually, one or two villains (a fanatic and/or the mastermind), one or two more neutral charaters, either accessory to the villain or mistaken associates of the villain and a girl to help/save), symbols to move towards the next clue, a sub-topic with scientific heritage, an aspect of religion or Masonry and a “sort of” happy ending.
Similar to his other books, I loved the journey and the way it has kept me reading page by page to find out what’s next, sparking my interest with new topics or ideas I never heard of before. I still feel like the ending was so abrupt, maybe because I am like Langdon who is a skeptic scholar or maybe because, I’m really just “not ready” to understand “The Lost Word” and the ancient mysteries.
I also liked the fact that it did not only maximized art and space (i.e. paintings and famous places) but also projected new age ideas including technological advancements (i.e. internet, codes/programming, hacking, iphone, texting, etc…). There was some moments where I felt I was reading The Secret or watching National Treasure 2 but I was proven wrong a few pages later.
What I don’t like about this book is the way it dragged me during the first seven chapters. It was laying down the setting and the plot but I didn’t like the feeling. Some readers expect action in the first chapter and I didn’t get to see that until Chapter 7 or 8. I also don’t like the fact that it seems “tamer” this time. I guess I was expecting some sort of exposé like Mary Magalene in the Last Supper of The Da Vinci Code or the political hierarchy, power and potential issues/secrets in the Papal Office of Angels and Demons. Here, it was more of respect of religion or faith, and how or what Masonry really is.
Watch out for a more in-depth review soon!

